Leave us a Message

Case Studies

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT SAYS THAT TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION IS MANDATORY FOR SECTION 34 PETITION CHALLENGING ARBITRAL AWARD

The Calcutta High Court, in the present case, dealt with the petition filed under Section

CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT SAYS THAT ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS SHOULD ONLY COMMENCE ONCE THE CONCILIATION FORMALLY ENDS

In this case, the Chattisgarh High Court examined whether an arbitral award passed by the

KERALA HIGH COURT SAYS THAT THE TECHNICAL NATURE OF A DISPUTE DOES NOT REQUIRE AN EXPERT TO BE THE PRESIDING ARBITRATOR

In this case, the Kerala High Court examined the procedure for

BOMBAY HIGH COURT SAYS THAT CONTRACTUAL CAP ON DAMAGES CANNOT REWARD EMPLOYER’S FUNDAMENTAL BREACH

In this case, the Bombay High Court examined the scope of judicial interference with an ar