Leave us a Message

Supreme Court says Parties Cannot Delay the Financial Protection Already Agreed Upon

Overview

In this case, the Supreme Court dealt with the dispute as to the enforcement of an arbitral award, and when an indemnity obligation can become enforceable. 

The appeal was filed against a judgement of the Delhi High Court, which refused to enforce the award at that particular stage. 

An important question before the Court was simple i.e., if one party promises to protect the other party from any financial liability, does this obligation only arise after the dispute is decided by the court, or when the liability begins to affect the party? 

The Court had to examine the drafting of the settlement to understand when exactly the obligation to pay would come into effect.  

 

Facts of the Case

The dispute arose from a sale of Rockland Hospitals, which was later renamed as Medeor Hospitals. Rockland entered into an agreement with Ernst & Young (EY) in 2015 to bring in investors.

In 2016, VPS Healthcare bought the entire company from its promoters. After this, disputes started arising between them, including the claims made by EY. 

To settle the same, both the parties entered into a deed of compromise in February 2019, which was further converted into a consent award by the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC). In the settlement, the promoters agreed that they would handle the legal cases, including the EY claim and would ensure that no liability as to finances falls on VPS or Medeor.

In 2021, an arbitral tribunal passed the award in favour of EY and Medeor was ordered to pay ?10 crore with interest and costs. This was challenged before the Delhi High Court by Medeor. Following the same, the court granted a stay only on the condition that Medeor deposits around ?15.86 crore.

The amount was deposited in 2023 and VPS/Medeor asked the promoters to reimburse the amount in consideration of the settlement. However, the High Court refused, by stating that the payment could be asked only after the final decision by the court. This led to an appeal to be filed before the Supreme Court.

 

Legal Issues

  1. Whether the amount which was paid by Medeor was subjected to actual financial liability. 
  2. Whether the obligation of the promoters was dependent on the final decision of the highest court.
  3. Whether an indemnity holder can claim an amount to be reimbursed before the final liability is determined. 
  4. Whether the Delhi High Court was correct in treating the petition for enforcement as premature.

 

Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal while stating that the promise made by the promoters was absolute. They agreed to ensure that VPS/Medeor does not suffer from any financial loss due to these disputes. 

It was also laid down that once Medeor was supposed to deposit such a huge amount, the financial burden had already begun. It was not necessary to wait for the final decision of the court.

The Court also stated that the High Court only focused on a certain portion of the agreement and ignored the overall intention behind the settlement. The promoters were ordered to repay the entire amount within 30 days, and it was also clarified that this particular payment will depend on the final result of the EY case.

 

Case reference:- VPS Healthcare Private Limited and Another (Appellants) Vs. Prabhat Kumar Srivastava and Another (Respondents) Civil Appeal No. _________ of 2026 @ Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 23869 of 2023
(DB, BEFORE S.V.N. BHATTI AND PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ., DELIVERED BY S.V.N. BHATTI, J.)